Peace Agreement between the Dogon & Peulh communities of Madougou and Barapirely

Country/entity
Mali
Region
Africa (excl MENA)
Agreement name
Peace Agreement between the Dogon & Peulh communities of Madougou and Barapirely
Date
24 Jan 2021
Agreement status
Multiparty signed/agreed
Interim arrangement
Yes
Agreement/conflict level
Intrastate/local conflict
Stage
Framework/substantive - partial
Conflict nature
Inter-group
Peace process
Mali Local Processes
Parties
For the Dogon community:
Atoye Doumbo, head of village of Materou
Mamoudou Perou, counsellor at Bande
Moussa Goro, head of village of Madougou
Hamidou Kodio, counsellor at Madougou
Souleymane Kodio, representative of the head of villahe of Kassawan Da
Yessa Goro, head of village of Domino Sogou
Mohamed Kodio, head of village of Anana
Issa Dougnon, head of village of Barapirely
Issiaka Poudiougo, head of village of Ourokoun
Timothee Dougnon, head of village of Anakanda
Hamidou Dougnon, head of village of Nagadourou

For the Fulani community:
Mamoudou Barry, head of village of Binedama
Daouda Barry, head of village of Naye
Hamidou Barry, head of village of Madougou Peulh
Moussa Djoune Barry, head of village of Karakinde
Aliou Kodjou Barry, counsellor at Naye
Bangole Barry, counsellor at Madougou Peulh
Aliou Hamadoun Barry, head of village of Bombou
Third parties
Witnesses
First witness: Allaye Teme, first vice-president of Monobem
Second witness: Saidou Dama, representative of Haut Conseil Islamique (High Islamic Council of Mali)
Third witness: Nouh Djeme, first vice-president of Recotrade


[Unsigned: mediators from the HD Centre]
Description
This is one of three agreements signed between the Fulani and Dogon with humanitarian objectives on 12, 22 and 24 January 2021, led by the Centre for Humanitarian Dialogue (HD) and the community association Monobèm. Through these agreements, the communities further commit to ensuring the physical integrity and free circulation of persons, goods, and livestock, while condemning the violence in the circle of Koro, in Central Mali. In this agreement, the representatives of the local communities agree to facilitate circulation of people and goods, access to lands and roads, attendance of markets, and access to NGOs, while at the same time committing to not carrying weapons.

Local agreement properties

Process type
Formal structured process
Rationale
The negotiations were supported by the HD Centre who noted that "these agreements are part of the mediation framework implemented by HD – also known as the Henry Dunant Centre – as mandated by the Office of the Prime Minister of Mali and with the financial support of the Government of Canada."
Is there a documented link to a national peace process?
Yes
Link to national process: articulated rationale
The link to the national process is suggested by the involvement of the Office of the Prime Minister of Mali in mandating that the negotiation be undertaken.
Name of Locale
Koro Circle
Nature of Locale
Region
GPS Lat/Long (DD)
14.360047, -3.086573
Participant type
Local state actor
Local armed group
International or transnational actor
Domestic religious organisation/leader or other elder
Local community/civilian group(s)/civil society organisations
Mediator, facilitator or similar
Mediator or similar referred to
Mediator (references)
The HD Centre was instrumental in bringing the representatives of the villages together in talks. Further, their announcement of the signing notes that "These agreements are part of the mediation framework implemented by HD – also known as the Henry Dunant Centre – as mandated by the Office of the Prime Minister of Mali and with the financial support of the Government of Canada."
Type of mediator/facilitator/similar
Central state actor Local community/civilian group(s)/civil society organisations International or transnational actor

Local issues

Ritual/prayer and process (including use of scripture)

No specific mention.

Grievance List
Page 2:
Recalling that in the past the Dogon and Peulh communities coexisted peacefully in the Koro Circle communes of Madougou and Barapirely, despite the tensions that have always existed between our communities concerning the management of resources natural that we share; 
Aware that these tensions are exacerbated by the high level of insecurity throughout the Dogon plateau, Senno and Gondo and that the current conflict has led to the end of economic activities, mass killings in 2018, and even the restriction of the free movement of people and their goods;

Page 3:
Chapter II: Causes and consequences of the conflict 
Article 2: The Parties agree that the inter-communal conflict between them across their municipalities is the result of the following elements: 
a)    Repeated attacks and looting of villages and hamlets by armed individuals; 
b)    Targeted assassinations of influential figures; 
c)    Massive cattle theft by both parties; 
d)    Attacks and ambushes against market stalls; 
e)    Embargoes on certain villages, water points, weekly markets, and the marketing of certain products (cereals, cattle, and milk), 
f)    Closure of basic social services (schools, health center, distribution stores, etc.), 
g)    Withdrawal of state agents and defense and security forces in all municipalities; 
h)    The feeling on both sides that the neighboring community has joined forces with armed groups to attack the other; 
i)    Lack of impartiality of the defense and security forces; 
j)    Lack of justice after cases of extrajudicial abuses; 
k)    Frustration due to unresolved or poorly resolved inter-communal conflicts on access to natural resources, etc.  

Article 3: The Parties agree that the inter-communal conflict between them in their municipalities has had the following consequences since the end of 2017: 

a)    The death of more than 350 people; 
b)    The displacement of more than 4000 people from 2018 to 2020; 
c)    The theft of 2500 heads of cattle; 
d)    Embargos in the markets of Madougou, Karakindé, Dangatènè, etc. ; 
e)    Restrictions on access to cultivable land in both municipalities; 
f)    Restrictions on movement between communities in the two municipalities.
Cattle rustling/banditry
Page 3:
Article 3: The Parties agree that the inter-communal conflict between them in their municipalities has had the following consequences since the end of 2017: 
 [...]
c)    The theft of 2500 heads of cattle;


Page 4:
Chapter III: Commitments of the Parties 

Article 4: The Parties jointly undertake to:   
[...]
h)    Oppose cattle theft regardless of the owner's community and facilitate the search for stolen goods and animals so that they can be returned to their owner; 
i)    Not claim animals and property removed or lost during the conflict ;
Social cover

No specific mention.

Peace Agreement between the Dogon & Peulh communities of Madougou and Barapirely

Koro Circle, Mali

January 2021

Preamble

We, the Dogon and Peulh communities of the communes of Madougou and Barapirely in the Koro Circle, hereinafter referred to as the Parties;

Aware that the conflict between us since 2017 is fueling the security crisis that is devastating the Koro Circle;

Taking into account the results of previous reconciliation efforts led by our communities, the State, collectives, associations, and the various attempts by the High Islamic Council of Koro.

Taking into account the peace agreement between the Dogon and Peulh communities of Koro signed in August 2018, following the unilateral ceasefire of Dana Amassagou facilitated by the Center for Humanitarian Dialogue and the reciprocal commitment of the Peulh community.

Determined to strengthen the first commitments agreed on during the preparatory inter-communal meetings facilitated by Monobèm de Madougou on February 23, 2020, Binédama on April 16, 2020, Anagadia on June 24, 2020, Karakindé on May 22, 2020, and Laiwaikandé on July 28, 2020, in the municipality of Madougou, which involved 107 villages in the communes of the Sangha and Dourou, and inter-communal meetings facilitated since September 2020 in Dangatène, Madougou, Toroli, and Pel;

Recalling that in the past the Dogon and Peulh communities coexisted peacefully in the Koro Circle communes of Madougou and Barapirely, despite the tensions that have always existed between our communities concerning the management of resources natural that we share;

Aware that these tensions are exacerbated by the high level of insecurity throughout the Dogon plateau, Senno and Gondo and that the current conflict has led to the end of economic activities, mass killings in 2018, and even the restriction of the free movement of people and their goods;

Aware that the conflict involving members of our respective communities may not end immediately with the signing of this Agreement, but will require a constant commitment on our part to peacefully manage disputes;

Determined to work to improve peaceful coexistence between our communities;

Aware that the attendance of the Madougou market by many Peulh for a little over two months is a pledge of confidence and social cohesion;

Gathered in Madougou on January 24, 2021, as part of the preparatory meetings facilitated since September 2020 by the Center for Humanitarian Dialogue;

We agree as follows:

Chapter I:

General Points

Article 1:

With this Agreement, the Parties declare peace between them and commit to making every effort to maintain it.

Chapter II:

Causes and consequences of the conflict

Article 2:

The Parties agree that the inter-communal conflict between them across their municipalities is the result of the following elements:

a) Repeated attacks and looting of villages and hamlets by armed individuals;

b) Targeted assassinations of influential figures;

c) Massive cattle theft by both parties;

d) Attacks and ambushes against market stalls;

e) Embargoes on certain villages, water points, weekly markets, and the marketing of certain products (cereals, cattle, and milk),

f) Closure of basic social services (schools, health center, distribution stores, etc.),

g) Withdrawal of state agents and defense and security forces in all municipalities;

h) The feeling on both sides that the neighboring community has joined forces with armed groups to attack the other;

i) Lack of impartiality of the defense and security forces;

j) Lack of justice after cases of extrajudicial abuses;

k) Frustration due to unresolved or poorly resolved inter-communal conflicts on access to natural resources, etc.

Article 3:

The Parties agree that the inter-communal conflict between them in their municipalities has had the following consequences since the end of 2017:

a) The death of more than 350 people;

b) The displacement of more than 4000 people from 2018 to 2020;

c) The theft of 2500 heads of cattle;

d) Embargos in the markets of Madougou, Karakindé, Dangatènè, etc. ;

e) Restrictions on access to cultivable land in both municipalities;

f) Restrictions on movement between communities in the two municipalities.

Chapter III:

Commitments of the Parties

Article 4:

The Parties jointly undertake to:

a) Encourage community leaders to commit to peace by forgiving all past acts and by spreading messages of cohesion and appeasement;

b) Facilitate the free movement of people and their goods throughout the two municipalities;

c) Encourage the establishment of measures of reciprocal confidence between communities (restitution of animals, condemnation of thieves, etc.);

d) Support and facilitate the return of all displaced persons;

e) Encourage and facilitate market attendance by all communities;

f) Not carry weapons in villages and towns

g) Invite the monitoring committee to dialogue with those who act against the spirit of the Agreement;

h) Oppose cattle theft regardless of the owner's community and facilitate the search for stolen goods and animals so that they can be returned to their owner;

i) Not claim animals and property removed or lost during the conflict ;

j) Facilitate the free use of natural and land resources by all communities (fields, pastures, passageways, travel stops, etc.);

k) Encourage the gradual return of basic social services and the movement of NGOs in the areas affected by the agreement,

l) Respect the habits and customs of the different communities and places of worship;

m) Respect the moral authority of traditional religious authorities who, before the crisis, preserved social cohesion and eased social tensions.

Chapter IV:

Recommendations addressed to the State

Article 5:

The Parties request that the State support their peace efforts in the Koro Circle communes of Madougou and Barapirely.

More specifically for the benefit of peaceful inter-communal coexistence, the Parties call on the State to:

a) Encourage the rehabilitation of destroyed villages;

b) With the support of partners, facilitate the return of displaced persons;

c) Provide humanitarian, economic, and food assistance to all communities affected by the crisis for economic recovery in the area;

d) Open a dialogue with armed groups to agree on a negotiated outcome for the young people who have renounced their weapons;

e) Build, repair, and provide communities with basic social infrastructure (water points, health centers, seeds, schools, etc.);

f) Help strengthen the legitimacy of traditional and religious authorities in their missions of pacification and citizen watch.

Chapter V:

Monitoring of implementation

Article 6:

The Parties undertake to meet once a quarter during the first year following the signing of this Agreement to take stock of the implementation of the Agreement and, if necessary, renew and adjust the commitments.

Article 7:

A Monitoring Committee will be set up, whose mission is to:

a) Regularly update the Parties on the progress made in implementing the commitments made under this Agreement to strengthen its scope;

b) Prevent and manage disputes between the Parties that may lead to non-compliance with this Agreement;

c) Identify, if necessary, additional measures necessary for the inter-communal reconciliation process.

d) Regularly update the State authorities on the progress made in implementing the commitments made under this Agreement to strengthen its scope;

Article 8:

15 members appointed by consensus to represent all of the Peulh and Dogon communities will make up the Monitoring Committee.

There will be 5 Dogon representatives from the municipality of Madougou, 5 Dogon representatives from the municipality of Barapirely, and 5 representatives from the Peulh community across both municipalities.

Chapter VI:

Dispute management

Article 9:

The parties will do everything in their power to settle amicably and by negotiation any dispute arising between them, in the spirit of cooperation and friendship which underlies this peace agreement.

Article 10:

In the event of a breach of the application of this Agreement or the event of a dispute relating to its interpretation, the Parties will refer the matter to the Monitoring Committee so that a consensual solution is identified and applied.

Article 11:

In the event of failure to apply the solution identified in a consensual manner with the Monitoring Committee, the Parties will jointly refer to traditional and religious dispute management mechanisms.

Article 12:

In the event of a serious breach of the application of this Agreement, and of a failure of all attempts at negotiation to remedy it, the Parties may terminate this Agreement.

Such termination will take effect on a specified termination date.

In this case, the Parties will take all necessary measures to minimize the impact of such a decision on the peace efforts already undertaken.

Chapter VII:

Final provisions

Article 13:

The Parties sign this Agreement in 5 copies in French and will try to translate them into Fulfuldé, Dogosso, and Bamanakan for better understanding.

Article 14:

This Agreement shall enter into force from the date of its signature by the Parties.

Done in Madougou, 24/01/2021